Yeah, I feel like the OP picture is more of a commentary about the overlap, or lack of overlap, between people who use ts, and people that use the service formerly known as Twitter.
I saw the writing on the wall when Netflix was forced to remove shows due to licensing.
Like many of you, I was on the "Yay Netflix" bandwagon for a while. And I remember the moment I realized I had to fish my black tri-point hat and eye patch out of the bin. It was the early 2010's and I was living in a single rental bedroom (student style). I had Netflix and I'm in Canada, but I was experimenting with ipv6, and I realized that Netflix's ipv6 geolocation stuff was flawed. I wasn't using a VPN, but my V6 address was a "US" address, so if I turned off IPv4, I could watch US Netflix. I was watching the show "Arrow", which I got really into early on. After a while, poof, it vanished. A bit of research and the license was pulled. It didn't take long for me to piece it together. They were going to make the show available on their own streaming platform.
Suddenly, I saw the whole picture. It was like cable, but worse. Each studio was going to have a streaming service and like cable packages, you'd have to subscribe to their streaming service to see their shows, while getting access to a bunch of crap you didn't care about, then have to find some way to track what shows were on which platforms and stay informed as to when new episodes were released, etc.... Same as with cable. I said to myself, hell no.
I got my hat and eye patch, hung my flag, and I've been sailing the seven seas since. Fuck that noise.
My main issue with it all (beyond the obvious cost) is managing, monitoring and using multiple services. I wanted a central dashboard of shows that will update with new episodes from shows I watch as they are released. I found Plex. I've been using it for something like 10 years or more, and I'm pretty happy about it.
Cable had the merit of channel flipping. You could easily flip from one studios station to another without barriers. Now, you have to go to a completely different app/website/whatever, to change. You probably have to log in, etc. It's a whole thing. What was a simple push of a button is now an entire ordeal. No thanks.
I knew this would be the eventual outcome and I was entirely right. My friends, if you haven't already, it may be time to dust off your own hats and eye patches and set sail once again.
This is why, as a straight dude, I wholeheartedly support everyone in the LGBTQ+ community. They're people, just like everyone else, and I'm sure there's some that are just terrible people, but on the whole, they're just folks trying to find their happiness just like everyone else.
I consider myself an ally, and I'll use any power I have to promote equality for everyone; whether that entails voting against people who would take their rights away, or try to silence them or whatever, speaking out against tyranny or judgemental asshats... It doesn't matter.
IMO, we are people first. Your choice in name, pronouns, gender identity, sexual orientation, etc, are all secondary to the fact that you are a human person deserving of all the same rights and privileges afforded to everyone else.
My favorite (tongue in cheek) comment, specifically about (gay) marriage is that LGBTQ+ people should have the right to be just as unhappy as the rest of us, in marriage.
While there definitely is a trope about "wife bad", and it's fairly common, people complaining about their spouse is nothing new. Men were able to insert it into pop culture far more frequently in the boomer days before there was even a facade of equality (both for gender and for race).
Now at least, there's a facade of equality if not genuine equality and as others have indicated, a lot of the spouse demeaning comedy has fallen out of favour.
So from the etymology of the trend, it could only be "wife bad" boomer humor to achieve the meme-like status that it has, when equality became a more important issue, those jokes fell out of favour.
To be perfectly clear, my statements are largely genderless, and that is very much on purpose. Since a husband may not have a wife, and a wife may not have a husband. Equally a spouse may not have a husband or wife.
I have done a lot to ensure that the language I use isn't gendered because there are people who don't identify as a gender or don't identify as a single gender. To which, my comments are largely taking about people, not men and women, so genderless terms are more correct to what I mean by my comments.
Yes, it's a little cringe to imply that all marriages are unhappy marriages. I tell this joke because it falls in the arena known as "dad" jokes, which I personally enjoy. Additionally, it subverts expectations by implying the negative of what would be normally expected, which is the bread and butter of my preferred humor.
This is emphasized by the fact of who I am and how my personality works. I like to give people something unexpected; I'll give you one easy example of not being funny but also not doing what's normally expected. If I walk into a room where a group of people are watching a sports game, I'll ask "who is losing?" Since most people would ask "who is winning?". It's weird, I'm weird, and I'm okay with that.
Do with that information as you will. The fact is I like going with the opposite of whatever most people would expect when it has no bearing on the information, it only inverts it. So rather than saying "the same right to be happily married as everyone else" I simply went for the opposite as I do with everything else. It's a quirk of my personality.
Thanks for replying to this. I'm not in Lemmy nearly as much as I would like.
I just want to note that the comment you replied to is wrong. Call it a quirk of my personality, but I like to ask the opposite of what's expected. The example I gave in another reply was walking in to a room where people are watching sports, instead of asking "who is winning?" As most would, I instead ask "who is losing?". The information is the same either way, provided you know who is playing, stating the loser implies who the winner is.
I don't mean to imply all marriages are unhappy, I just simply flipped the script, so to speak, and instead of saying they have the same right to a happy marriage, I say the opposite, not because I think they're doomed to be unhappy in marriage, but because people usually expect an implication of everyone being happy in marriage.
I think the reason I do this is because it makes people think about their response more than if they're asked what people expect them to ask. But IDK, I'm no psychiatrist.
Either way, I appreciate your comments here, and I wanted to leave you a note to say so, and provide a bit of information. I hope you have a great day.
The pain was that you had no idea what the image really contained until it was downloading. Sure, thumbnails existed, but they were like 20x20. So you didn't know if you were getting someone naked, or someone wearing a beige body suit or some other nonsense.
About halfway through you could usually make a judgement call on whether you wanted to finish the download or try a different picture.
It makes me sad because Google used to be great. The main feature that made Google great was the click rejection. Basically the search would know when you clicked on a link and didn't come back to the search results. This action would add weight to that result as "this probably has the information that was being searched for" so it would be nearer to the top later when others made similar queries.
This was their killer feature, it basically crowd sourced the correct information. After a small amount of time, the correct results would kind of float to the top so subsequent searches would put those results near the top to help satisfy queries faster.
Now? They seem to want to give you results that satisfy their partners, and keep you tied to the results page as long as possible. The focus seems to have shifted from being a good search engine with accurate results, to a meme of how to make money.
Never before has this shift been more clear to me than right now, directly in the wake of I/O 2024; an event my friends have taken to calling AI/O. Pretty much every single presentation was about Gemini and AI generated garbage, but this isn't what made Google's new direction clear to me. In the last 20-30 minutes of the event it was made perfectly clear what they were doing with I/O. And to drive the point home, every I/O has showcased stuff you can't use yet, stuff they're working on, and other cool shit. Some of it cost money, but there was usually some stuff that was just done because it could be done and it would be made available at some point, a nontrivial amount of it was free. At AI/O, the entire focus was on AI, with little to no non-AI stuff in there, at all, then at the end, they kicked everyone in the shorts. Here's our prices to access this shit. Buy it. As far as I'm concerned AI/O was a gigantic marketing circle jerk to sell their AI.
It seems that Google has entered the final phases of enshittification.
Oh, that stuff happens all the time. The one that really pissed me off was Microsoft 404-ing basically their entire KB system.
That thing was standing for so long you could still find Windows 9x stuff on it, and it was glorious.
Around the time they stopped supporting windows 7, they bricked the entire thing up and started a new system. Overnight, all the Microsoft help article links went dead. Find a good forum post about an issue that you're having and someone replied with a link to the MS KB saying little more than "this should work" followed by a sea of commenters saying thanks, that worked, but when you follow the link, it goes nowhere.
The thing with Google was that the data about click through vs click back was supposed to be anonymised. Whether it was or not, inside of the black box that is Google's algorithm, who knows?
Either way, I'd be interested if you get any progress here. I've never tried to self host a search engine, but I might consider it.
I wonder if the internet archive has a full copy of the KBs from before Microsoft dumped them. I'd love to set those up in a web server so I can reference them as needed.
I have some land prepared for a garden. It was pretty well laid out by the previous owner of the property. I'll have some costs in getting it going, since the last guy used it mainly for flowers, so I want to put in some raised beds and something to keep the animals away from my food, beyond that, it's all planting and waiting. It rains sufficiently here so no need for irrigation, and there's plenty of sun. The soil is pretty decent too.
Direct financial costs will be minimal, year over year, and then it's just the indirect cost of my time to tend to it as it grows.
If I'm seeing this correctly, those are from ESS, aka, eye shield systems. I owned a pair of their ICE eye shields for a while.
They use a bullet resistant material for the "lenses" which can help reduce the impact of some projectiles, in the hope that it will save you from losing your vision from being shot in the face.
I believe their benchmark was some kind of shotgun round at a few meters, probably birdshot or other small/sprayed shot.
I bought them because they're roughly equivalent to most safety glasses, and I was doing work at the time that required such personal protective equipment. Mine came with three "lenses", one clear, one that was amber, and one they called "smoke" which appears to be what this character is wearing.
I liked the eyewear, but I seem to have lost mine over the years. I would buy it again simply for the durability, as driving glasses. However, since I'm not a kid anymore, and I have financial responsibilities, I can't really justify $100+ on eyewear unless it's a prescription or something else I require in order to live.
I assume this guy has ESS because he is a GUN fanatic. So he wears them while being unsafe with his GUNs.
As stupid as it is, it doesn't stop a creator from simply demonstrating issues, without commentary. Just show people the issues and don't remark on them.
That being said, nobody should sign this. Trying to forbid people from making satirical remarks? What the crap?
The most impressive bathroom layout I've ever seen was pretty open concept. It seems strange, but let me explain.
Directly off of a major area was basically a hallway, on that hallway was a set of doors. Full sized doors. One right after the other. Each door led to a room which is smaller than most closets, containing a toilet. That was about it for what's in the room. Of course the usual toilet/stall amenities were available. At the end of this hallway of toilet closets, was a long sink for handwashing.
It was entirely gender neutral, and there was zero risk of rape or any other perceived danger.
I'm sure the closet stall design took up slightly more floor space than your average bathroom stall. Honestly it seems like a small price to pay to have a room all to yourself when you're doing your business.
I'm sure that adopting this design would get cries from the fragile men about their precious urinals. Honestly, fuck them. The toilet does the job, you animal.
That's some interesting conjecture there. Clearly you and I know different kinds of fellows.
Some of the guys I know would rather piss outside than go find a toilet. A tree is about as close as you can get to a urinal in nature. I've also seen guys wait for a urinal when toilets are clearly available.
Of course, not all men are like this, but I've met a nontrivial number who are.
I've known guys who had urinals installed in their homes and whatnot. IMO, it's weird, but they can do what they want.
To be perfectly clear, I don't believe that represents the majority of men, but an outspoken minority can be noisy enough to push the needle one way or another simply because the majority doesn't care one way or the other. It happens all the time.
There's also the mindset of maintaining the status quo at all costs, whether because those people simply do not want to adapt or change, or because they want those that don't fit into the narrow heteronormative viewpoint. The underlying reasons change, and sometimes people are genuine in their reasoning, but it's all reasoning to keep with what we have and not change to something that is objectively better.
Most of the time when fellows use the toilet when the urinals are full, which does happen quite often, they don't even fully latch, or even close the door for the stall.
However, the fact that this is true, does not negate that there are a nontrivial number of guys who won't use the toilet on principle.
I use Ubuntu for all my home lab servers unless there's a specific requirement for something else.
I never install the desktop version except when experimenting, and in those cases, I'd be just as happy using any other distro, since those use cases are fairly limited both in scope and duration.
Ubuntu is just the os I put on virtual servers.
Judge me if you want. I really could not possibly care less. I also use Windows on my daily driver desktop.
I'm considering going canonical MAAS for a new deployment of open stack servers which will be replacing my current hypervisors (which are VMware), pushing Ubuntu and OpenStack onto systems for use and probably also using MAAS to roll out future virtual machines in OpenStack.
I honestly don't pay that much attention to what packages are installed. As long as system loads are acceptable when nothing is running, leaving sufficient resources for whatever needs doing.
I'm surprised that the billboards and stuff in games are not ads already. So many racing a FPS games that have scenery of billboards and stuff, it's all prime real estate for ads.
A police officer in riot gear swinging his baton over journalist Olga Fedorova after having pushed her to the ground, shortly before her arrest. Fedorova is staring defiantly back at the cop, still pointing her camera at him. Photo credit Alex Kent (alex-kent.com, via twitter @AlexKentTN)
I have several domain names, some have websites that I haven't touched in years, some have email that I equally haven't touched in years, and some are just ideas that I never followed through on.
I blog about network stuff, because computer networking is a passion of mine, and I get some okay views on it. Some of the posts are about pretty obscure stuff.
I've been meaning to create a website about good network design geared at home users, and how to make their home network suck less. Strategies on how to run ethernet, whether easy mode or hard mode and the benefits of each, even a subsection on options for renters to do it. Explanations on why your wifi probably sucks and how to improve the situation, etc. Wiki style.
It's a lot of writing and I know a lot about the subject matter, so each article would have a companion deep dive article so you can go deeper into why this or that affects your wifi or home network in the way that it does... Etc. But also have practical tips to avoid problems in the main article. It's an entire concept that I feel like the internet needs, but I have yet to find anyone publishing that kind of content.
Sure, you can get a bunch of technical detail on Wikipedia, but it doesn't really explain the real world consequences of things, just how they work. That's fine if you have an understanding of how things interact, but if you're new, it's just a confusing mess.
I just want to educate people into building better home networks, spending more (and less) money and why you would want to do that, where and when... How to use planning software, etc. Basically, I want to take the entirety of my wireless knowledge and put it out there for anyone to browse and learn from.
Don't like the sound of that ( lemmy.world )
job rule ( lemmy.world )
ts moment ( lemmy.ml )
Very nuanced issue ( lemmy.eco.br )
Get your old black powder bombs ready ( i.imgur.com )
Pray they don't alter it any further ( lemmy.world )
Anon catches his wife ( sh.itjust.works )
Don't try me because I looked at the Playtex girdles and feared nothing. ( lemmy.world )
Later, losers ( lemmy.world )
The state of things ( i.imgur.com )
What it's like to be a developer in 2024 ( sopuli.xyz )
Source
A cool guide to PIN code safety ( i.redd.it )
https://www.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/1cr8bgo/a_cool_guide_to_pin_code_safety/...
It is very therapeutic to garden, though. ( lemmy.today )
rule ( lemmy.world )
What a free-thinker! ( lemmy.world )
Marvels Rivals requires creators to sign a contract that removes your right to give a negative review in order to access the playtest ( files.catbox.moe )
On today's episode of "This shouldn't be legal"......
Secret ( lemmy.world )
Via Channelate
maybe the woke was inside us all along ( lemmy.cafe )
Using Ubuntu may give off hipster vibes to the average PC user, but within the Linux community its has the opposite effect.
hot take?...
[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]
EA is looking at putting in-game ads in AAA games — 'We'll be very thoughtful as we move into that,' says CEO ( www.tomshardware.com )
Stormy Daniels testimony reveals the triumph of #MeToo ( www.salon.com )
The signs are aligned. ( lemmy.world )
Linkedin ( jlai.lu )
Arrest of journalist Olga Fedorova (Alex Kent, New York, May 8 2024)
What is your little slice of the internet that you own/maintain?
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLopDcjdhYBYkHE_nqV7QNzrCsnscs2amf&si=q-PTjPEwEvuGWnkJ...