This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Mexico is heading towards its most violent election ever, with 30 candidates murdered, 77 threatened and 11 kidnapped ( english.elpais.com )

More than 170 attacks have been committed against politicians in the lead-up to the June elections. This violence has put campaigns under tension and is sowing doubts about governability in several regions. Specialists warn that the line between the Mexican state and organized crime is increasingly blurred...

fawanen ,

B-b-b-but El Salvador is a DICTATORSHIP!

-clueless westerners

fawanen ,

They could try take El Salvador's approach.

It's quite a world we live in where Mexico is becoming the new El Salvador.

fawanen ,

Tell that to the victims of the gangbangers.

fawanen ,

Interesting. I'm definitely going to be checking this out.

If I have to decide between two products and one of them has fewer ties to Israel, you know which one I'm going to pick.

fawanen ,

Zionists don't play fair.

They are religious nationalists, after all.

fawanen ,

I'm guessing you have no idea what those technologies do.

Google Admob is literally for serving ads.

Crashlytics is for monitoring crashes.

Firebase analytics is for monitoring firebase usage, which is required for things like push notifications when using firebase.

Try uploading an app to the Google Play store yourself before you spread FUD on matters you know nothing about.

fawanen ,

He doesn't know but still wanted to feel useful.

fawanen ,

No it doesn't.

fawanen ,

Boycotts work.

fawanen ,

Look up specifically what Admob, Crashlytics, and Firebase analytics track.

That’s the thing about data collection: its a lot of money to store. How are they funding the operation unless turning you into the product?

Are you referring to data on users, or data on the products this app tracks? The app doesn't need to store user data beyond what is required for it to function. Even if it stored such data, each user will only take up kilobytes to maybe a few megabytes because it's just text data.

As for the data on the products, by far the largest files would be images. The rest is just text data.

Standard Google Cloud Storage is $0.20/GB per month. There's no need for this app to store 16k+ photos, so the actual storage costs are negligible.

Israel, US said working to prevent ICC arrest warrant against Netanyahu ( www.timesofisrael.com )

According to reports in several Israeli media, the United States is part of a last-ditch diplomatic effort to prevent the International Criminal Court from issuing arrest warrants against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials....

fawanen ,

To be fair, we all know the US is going to do everything in its power to protect zionists and their genocide.

Court upholds New York law that says ISPs must offer $15 broadband ( arstechnica.com )

Trade groups claimed the state law is preempted by former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai's repeal of net neutrality rules. Pai's repeal placed ISPs under the more forgiving Title I regulatory framework instead of the common-carrier framework in Title II of the Communications Act....

fawanen ,

Where the fuck do these groups get their money?

Don't tell me it's from profiting off of morons?

fawanen ,

I pay $25/month for unlimited data with Visible.

It's not quite broadband speed, but it's pretty close and certainly enough for most internet usage.

I'm usually streaming games at 1080p to multiple chatrooms on a laptop with no issues.

It's definitely possible to have landline broadband at $15/month, but all the excess profits these people have been making are going to be used to protect more profits.

fawanen ,

Thanks for pointing out the facts.

Crazy how you're being downvoted for telling the truth while he's being upvoted for spreading a lie.

fawanen ,

Here's your internet points

fawanen ,

Why are you mentioning this?

We've already established that isn't true. She killed her dog because her dog killed her neighbor's chickens.

I never said whether or not it was okay. Just trying to stick with the facts while lies are getting upvoted.

fawanen ,

People are forced to put down dogs who attack humans.

fawanen ,

The problem with that is that the effects of our ancestors are real whether we like it or not.

Some people are living way better lives than others because their ancestors screwed over other ancestors.

Is it really fair that people should have egregious excess as a result of exploitation?

Is it really fair that the descendants of slaves should be punished for what other people's ancestors did?

fawanen ,

"Fuck you, got mine."

fawanen ,

We can only fix the future by taking an act today

That's what reparations are for.

fawanen ,

How is this America's fault? If anything, this is only happening because the US can't protect them.

fawanen ,

What makes you think women and queers would have better living conditions if the US didn't invade?

fawanen ,

Saddam Hussein, in an attempt to maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists, brought in anti-woman legislation, such as the 1990 presidential decree granting immunity to men who had committed honour crimes.[123]: 202  However, despite Saddam’s appeals to the anti-women elements of Iraqi society, according to local NGOs, they concluded that “women were treated better during the Saddam Hussein era and their rights were more respected than they are now.”

It looks to me like this would've happened anyways, it was just a matter of time.

Did you think they were going to stop "attempting to maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists" at any point?

fawanen ,

1991 takes place after 1990, which is when Saddam "brought in anti-woman legislation, such as the 1990 presidential decree granting immunity to men who had committed honour crimes."

They started “attempting to maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists” before the 1991 Gulf War, yet you think the 1991 Gulf War is what caused them to "maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists”?

You also think that if it wasn't for a war that took place after they started "attempting to maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists” that they would've magically stopped "attempting to maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists.”

Interesting.

fawanen ,

That doesn’t change the fact that homosexuality was legal when he was in charge and illegal now.

I re-iterate my previous point of "it looks to me like this would’ve happened anyways, it was just a matter of time."

"Did you think they were going to stop 'attempting to maintain legitimacy with conservative Islamic fundamentalists' at any point?"

fawanen ,

Is she going to do anything about the gangbangers running the country?

fawanen ,

Asus has always just seemed like a glossier Acer with higher prices and worse quality.

I personally hate their ROG gamer aesthetic and think whoever came up with that should've been fired and blacklisted from the industry.

fawanen ,

I had the exact same issue with an Asus laptop from a few years before yours.

It was fucking bullshit.

fawanen ,

History continues to repeat itself.

There was never a scenario where South African whites would have similar amount of wealth as blacks.

fawanen ,

by allowing prosecutors to call witnesses whose allegations were not related to the charges at hand.

I don't understand. If the witnesses allegations "were not related to the charges at hand," then they shouldn't affect the outcome of the trial, right?

Who exactly gets to determine if witness allegations are related to the charges, anyways? Apparently not the jury! Lol.

Also, a 4 to 3 decision? Really doesn't look good for New York's "highest court." Seems like their palms were greased just enough to let this guy slide.

The law exists for rich people and only rich people.

fawanen ,

It's about who you know, not what you know.

fawanen ,

I guess my issue is having some "higher authority" determine what evidence is relevant and what evidence is not relevant for jurors.

That should be for the jurors to decide. If a peer thinks that 80 women coming forth to testify that you raped them is relevant to their decision, then how can someone not on the jury just cancel them out?

Seems to me like a prosecutor bringing in their cousin to tell the jury he had an orange for breakfast is irrelevant, but that should be for each juror to decide for themselves. If the prosecution wants to waste time with irrelevant information, then that shouldn't help their case. If the information actually helps their case, then is it really irrelevant?

If the peers disagree with the judges, the judges win. At that point it's not a trial by your peers. It's a trial by judges.

I suppose it's also hilarious because "relevancy" is not something that can be measured or quantified. It's essentially just how much you can convince others that it's relevant or not.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • tech
  • kbinEarth
  • testing
  • interstellar
  • wanderlust
  • All magazines