So, jokes aside, people eat all kinds of different things, so legit question here: is there any traditional recipe/dish based on another species' semen? Is there any culture who eats that?
I know in Switzerland there is a traditional dish of bull's testicles (which I know from a way too long advertisement on youtube that showed the recipe in promotion of the region, don't remember the region but that ad has been branded into my brain). And that you can also prepare utter. But I am asking specifically about cum here. Just out of curiosity of course....
Milt is, apparently, a thing which is eaten in a number of cultures. I couldn't find any other non-fish examples, though, which was a little surprising.
Testicles make more sense because it's easy to acquire, you just butcher the animal. Same with blood. Milk is also produced regularly with a little more work. Semen requires ejaculation AFAIK, which feels both much harder and much weirder to perform.
Regardless, whenever shit like this happens, there is almost always some funny shit that shows up on e6 in about a week. Same thing happened with the recent bear posting.
I dunno about this. When I buy bully sticks they list the names of all the bulls on them. I think it's weird either way, prefer it if food products weren't quite that personalized.
I'm also hearing this notion for the first time, so there's probably more to it, but I guess at the very least, if you're treating all creatures as friends, you'll also definitely treat women as friends.
Dairy depends on exploiting and taking advantage of female reproductive organs. Misogyny also views human woman as only good for birthing kids and taking care of the kids, exploiting their reproductive organs in a different way.
what they're saying is that you're pointing out that this is whats happening, and that this is another thing related to this thing via a tangential connection.
You have no idea who owns those cows, or if those cows even exist, or if those are even the names of those cows. Literally all you know is that that's what it says. We have nothing that should lead us to a conclusion of anything other than "huh, they used old human names, that are female, probably because naming non human things, human names would be weird, and probably female, because well, the animals are female, though since it's not explicitly human animals, they don't need explicitly human names, so quite a few of them are just, weird."
This is like seeing 911 happen, and then seeing another building collapse somewhere else due to bad maintenance (or whatever reason, it doesnt matter) and going "must be terrorism"
The names part of the connection is why I said the person in the post is making the point in a dumb way. The names are irrelevant.
What we do know is that the body of at least one cow somewhere was used to get the milk that was turned into the yogurt. That objectification and exploitation of their body and reproductive organs has parallels to misogyny, for one thing both disregard bodily autonomy.
idk i think i'd be more concerned about the fact that humans are literally willing to round up hundreds of thousands of animals for produce and food, and feeling no remorse for it, rather than the slight parallel between what is literally comparable to the holocaust (except it's cows and beef/milk, instead of jews and hitler) than the very generalized problem that society has towards women specifically.
Like don't get me wrong here, i don't think you're wrong, i just also don't think that this is probably the place and time to be talking about it like it's some sort of moral fixation. When there is literally a better one to use.
That objectification and exploitation of their body and reproductive organs has parallels to misogyny, for one thing both disregard bodily autonomy.
You go from fact to this insane bullshit in an instant. That's your pseudo-psycho-sociological take with there is no basis in reality except you physically typing it out.
This Freshman-grade blathering needs actual evidence because it is such a outlandish claim.
Everyone with a vagina doesn't have just names like those. Their names could be anything Alex, Felix, Dani, etc, but they choose names that they think people with vaginas should have, like all ones from back when women had very few rights.
Dafft_ish, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
This is grade A misogynistic man-splaining disguised as a shit, uncalled for, joke.
Or Roza just said something really stupid about the cows being named shit like Root. Your virtue signaling is extremely misplaced in this case, I'm afraid.
I'm having a hard time believing that's not a troll, and the reaction you're having here, calling someone a "clown feminist," is exactly what they were trying to provoke
Fun fact about asparagus that I didn't fact check: Only some people have bad smelling pee after eating asparagus and only some people can smell the bad pee at all. There was science done on this.
